Have a clear understanding about why we medsos-ing do you use it for:
– just having fun?
– romantic / looking for partner?
– share experience? ? AKA nyombong
– money?
Whatever it is be clear about it… easier said than done… after so many years having twitter… I think I can say I dont have a clear purpose… I just go with the flow…

Jakarta di Starbuck yang harga americanonya 32rb… Sic

Tanggapan saya terhadap tulisan @awemany disini : https://ardiwirdamulia.com/2016/10/05/bagi-ahok-anda-dan-saya-cuma-barang-pameran-mati-kita/

Gade‏@gadeblazz

tapi sepertinya kog sayang rasanya pas punya waktu kog om awe di biarkan ngoceh sendirin… demikian… mandi dulu… :)

Few weeks back I am in the situation where I have to make a tough choice… One particular client has not signed the agreement, for two months..! We never had a problem before and the relationship is fantastic. My contat person is a woman… head of her division… I can describe her as the “coach” in that company, basically she inform me of the situation ahead of time, so I can prepare the things correctly, both information and politically.

When a client has been in two months receiving service without agreement, let alone payment, warned it many times that I can not continue providing the service to her team when we have not receive the agreement at certain date.

Certainly  the deadline is passed… I hold all the services… fair enough right… :). but my contact badly need me presenting to their bosses… and I told her, I bend my back to give them 2 months of service without agreement… so no dice… agreement first I said…

She is very surprise, little that I know she actually do not understand that we have certain deadline… the team has not properly communicated to her. Well, when she hear me saying that… she snapped and throw her phone… I can hear the sound of the phone hitting the desk :)

So there you go.. she will not respond to my email, phone or anything anymore, the bridge has burned. Flaming like the golden sun during the sunset, Beautiful… NOT. My boss almost has an heart attack knowing the situation (this client is one of the biggest revenue)… I said dont worry… I will solve it…

Later on I expressed my dissappointment with her team. So they speed up the process of signing the agreement, I also help them provide Top of The Line information… she still not responded my goodwill gesture, no thank you, no nothing… you know… woman… :)

So I have to find a way to meet her… she will not respond to any meeting invitation… so I aks  her team where can I meet her in person.. they told me that she usually go to a cafe after office hour,  I went there and meet her in person… at first, she is very surprised but she can not do anything because I already in front of her and said “Hi”with happy face, and the shake her hand and said. How are you… and you know what she said..?

“I still mad at you” she said… Yea I know… I respond… but I have limitation too you know… you will do the same if you were me. And she blurted  many many many words to express how dissapointed she is how she feel betrayed after all these years helping me… I patienly listening, you know… woman,  :).  cut the story short… we agreed on what we have to do when there is a very important deadline and there, we amended the bridge… no romance sorry… :)

Jkt 29th April

Hasil tes moral… Fairness dan Care / Harm is important to me, Fairness lebih tinggi dari rata rata orang liberal dan konservatif di Amerika, berikut ini penjelasannya:

The scale you completed was the “Moral Foundations Questionnaire,” developed by Jesse Graham and Jonathan Haidt at the University of Virginia.

The scale is a measure of your reliance on and endorsement of five psychological foundations of morality that seem to be found across cultures. Each of the two parts of the scale contained three questions related to each foundation: 1) harm/care, 2) fairness/reciprocity (including issues of rights), 3) ingroup/loyalty, 4) authority/respect, and 5) purity/sanctity.

The idea behind the scale is that human morality is the result of biological and cultural evolutionary processes that made human beings very sensitive to many different (and often competing) issues. Some of these issues are about treating other individuals well (the first two foundations – harm and fairness). Other issues are about how to be a good member of a group or supporter of social order and tradition (the last three foundations). Haidt and Graham have found that political liberals generally place a higher value on the first two foundations; they are very concerned about issues of harm and fairness (including issues of inequality and exploitation). Political conservatives care about harm and fairness too, but they generally score slightly lower on those scale items. The big difference between liberals and conservatives seems to be that conservatives score slightly higher on the ingroup/loyalty foundation, and much higher on the authority/respect and purity/sanctity foundations.

This difference seems to explain many of the most contentious issues in the culture war. For example, liberals support legalizing gay marriage (to be fair and compassionate), whereas many conservatives are reluctant to change the nature of marriage and the family, basic building blocks of society. Conservatives are more likely to favor practices that increase order and respect (e.g., spanking, mandatory pledge of allegiance), whereas liberals often oppose these practices as being violent or coercive.

In the graph below, your scores on each foundation are shown in green (the 1st bar in each set of 3 bars). The scores of all liberals who have taken it on our site are shown in blue (the 2nd bar), and the scores of all conservatives are shown in red (3rd bar). Scores run from 0 (the lowest possible score, you completely reject that foundation) to 5 (the highest possible score, you very strongly endorse that foundation and build much of your morality on top of it).